Commons:Deletion requests/File:日月旗.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no relyable source indicating that this flag is the flag of Ming dynasty. (I am just helping zh:User:爱学习的饭桶 to nominate it for deletion, go to his talk page for more information) DS-fax 13:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- AnonMoos left a message on my talk page saying that commons usually keep special or fictional flags. However, it's not even a "fictional flag", because the source of the description of the flag is "hi.baidu.com", which is a blog, and there seems to be nowhere to use this "fictional flag". --DS-fax 07:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep: Wikimedia Commons has many "special or fictional flags", and we don't usually delete them just for being special or fictional (though they can be deleted for being maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering). If File:Flag of the Fatimid Empire.svg survived a deletion request, then this one should do so also, unless there's some additional level of bogosity beyond what you've already mentioned. However, feel free to add Template:Fictitious flag... AnonMoos (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. Any discussions at zh:User_talk:爱学习的饭桶 don't seem to be in English... AnonMoos (talk) 05:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep--玖巧仔 (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- 饭桶尊重Commons的规定，但是如果File:日月旗.svg必须保留，请一定要在描述上使用中英文表明这面旗帜未见于正规的史学刊物，属于臆造的旗帜。以免以讹传讹，贻笑大方。此外，由于这幅“日月旗”是近几年才出现的，饭桶也怀疑这面旗帜的版权状态。--爱学习的饭桶 (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Translation:" I respect the consensus of Commons, but if the image File:日月旗.svg must be kept, it should be noted that the flag is made up and that it's not seen in formal historiography journals, in case wrong information would spread out. Furthermore, the flag appeared only a few years ago, so I have doubts about the copyright status of the image." --DS-fax 14:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete each country domain of wikipedia is treated on its own wiki domain. There is no reason to help china boy when he has wikipedia.zh domain. Why should wikipedia.commons store a chinese file ?Special+Utilizator+$ (talk) 05:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, that doesn't make too much sense -- many Chinese flag images on Commons are used on many different Wikipedias in articles discussing China and Chinese history. 05:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: in use Jcb (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Original research, misleading, and without educational significance. Konno Yumeto 14:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- First off Commons does not actually have any policy against original research. Second, people are entitled to use it on their personal userpages if they want. AnonMoos (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The objection above is not grounded in (and wholly ignores) poliy: COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Files which are COM:INUSE, by definition, cannot be out of scope. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
